Bureaucratic Neutrality in Electoral Contests and Its Democratic Implications: A Systematic Literature Review and Analysis
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research explores the concept of bureaucratic neutrality and its significant role in maintaining electoral integrity, particularly in Indonesia. Political dynasties, with their monopolization of political power, present a major challenge to the democratic process, as they limit electoral fairness and hinder the transparency of election outcomes. The study aims to analyze the relationship between bureaucratic neutrality and democratic processes, emphasizing the need for impartiality in electoral administration. The research methodology includes a systematic literature review, focusing on key studies that examine the impact of political interference and partisanship on electoral processes. The findings suggest that the erosion of bureaucratic neutrality due to political pressures and patronage networks compromises the legitimacy of elections, leading to voter disillusionment and reduced participation. Furthermore, the study reveals that maintaining neutrality is crucial for fostering public trust and ensuring that elections reflect the true will of the people. Implications of the research emphasize the need for stronger institutional frameworks, legal reforms, and independent oversight bodies to protect the neutrality of electoral bureaucrats. The study highlights the importance of transparency, decentralization, and political diversity in creating a fair and competitive electoral system, which is essential for the consolidation of democracy in Indonesia.
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Ahmad, Z., & Mujab, S. (2025). Dinasti Politik Dan Masa Depan Demokrasi Di Indonesia. Integrative Perspectives of Social and Science Journal, 2(3), 4601–4608.
Akbar, Nurfaisal, Dwi, & Habib. (2025). Restoring Integrity: Re-Voting of the 2025 Serang Regent Election and Its Transformative Power for Local Democracy. Journal of Contemporary Local Politics, 4(1), 81–91.
Arifin, M., Budi, D., & Chairil, A. (2025). Partisipasi Pemilih dan Kualitas Demokrasi dalam Perspektif Hukum Tata Negara. Journal of Public Administration and Management Studies, 24–27.
Azahwa, S., Mayesa, B., Vadia, A., Rahmania, H., & Adzzahra, F. (2025). Implikasi Sistem Presidensial dengan Konsep Multipartai Terhadap Stabilitas Politik di Indonesia Pada Pemilu 2024: Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice, 2(4), 1–13.
Azahwa, V., & Paryontri, R. (2023). Work life balance: Study of the relationship between work stress and job satisfaction in employees. Psikoborneo: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi, 11(2), 286–291.
Bachtiar, R. (2019). Tantangan Open Government Dalam Upaya Penguatan Sistem Demokrasi Di Indonesia. Kebijakan Publik Kontemporer (Contemporary Public Policy), 1(1), 175–192.
Bozeman, B., Nelson, J., Bretschneider, S., & Lindsay, S. (2024). The deformation of democracy in the United States: When does bureaucratic “neutral competence” rise to complicity? Public Administration Review, 84(5), 796–816.
Cooper, C. (2020). Public servants, anonymity, and political activity online: bureaucratic neutrality in peril? International Review of Administrative Sciences, 86(3), 496–512.
Fasya, T. (2013). Beban Berat Demokrasi Partisipatoris (Studi Kasus Aceh Besar). Jurnal Transformasi Administrasi, 3(2), 537–553.
Fatiha, A., & Santosa, W. (2022). Pemilihan umum sebagai wujud pelaksanaan demokrasi di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Dan Sosial Humaniora, 1(3), 345–352.
Gomide, A. (2022). Democracy and bureaucracy in newly industrialized countries: A systematic comparison between Latin America and East Asia. Governance, 35(1), 83–102.
Gooch, D., & Wofford, P. (2017). Is Neutrality a Feature or a Bug? Delegation, Discretion, and the Democratic Implications of Administrative Law in a Polarized Institutional Environment. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 39(4), 292–312.
Hasrin, A., Sutinah, S., & Koesbardiati, T. (2025). Mobilizing Climate Justice Online: A Systematic Review of Social Media's Impact on Advocacy. Estudos em Comunicação, 1(41), 141-161.
Huber, J., & Ting, M. (2021). Civil service and patronage in bureaucracies. The Journal of Politics, 83(3), 902–916.
Jelly, G., & Prihana, E. (2025a). Peran dan Tantangan DPR-RI dalam Mewujudkan Demokrasi di Indonesia. Imperium: Jurnal Kajian Pemerintahan Dan Kebijakan Publik, 1(2), 53–63.
Jelly, G., & Prihana, E. (2025b). Peran dan Tantangan DPR-RI dalam Mewujudkan Demokrasi di Indonesia. Imperium: Jurnal Kajian Pemerintahan Dan Kebijakan Publik, 1(2), 53–63.
Lubis, H., Dwi, L., & Ikram, M. (2025). Dinamika Intervensi Politik dalam Pembentukan Regulasi di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Dakwah Dan Ilmu Komunikasi, 1(1), 1–31.
Maulana, M., Nurfaisal, M., & Al-Ra’zie, Z. (2025). Restoring Integrity: Re-Voting of the 2025 Serang Regent Election and Its Transformative Power for Local Democracy. Journal of Contemporary Local Politics, 4(1), 81–91.
Nadzirin, A., Sukmariningsih, R., & Mashari, M. (2025). Does the State Civil Apparatus Violate Neutrality During Elections? Journal of Sustainable Development and Regulatory Issues (JSDERI), 3(2), 400–433.
Ningtyas, V. (2021). Netralitas Aparatur Sipil Negara Dalam Pemilu Antara Hak Politik dan Kewajiban Untuk Melaksanakan Tata Kelola Pemerintahan yang Baik. Binamulia Hukum, 15(30), 10–11.
Noer, H. (2024). Portrait of the Politicization of Indonesian Bureaucracy in the 2024 Election. International Journal of Social Service and Research, 4(3), 752–769.
Noer, H. (2025). Patologi Kelembagaan Demokrasi Elektoral: Korupsi Politik Di Indonesia Pasca-Reformasi. AEGIS: Journal of International Relations, 9(1), 1–13.
Norris, P. (2019). Conclusions: The new research agenda on electoral management. International Political Science Review, 40(3), 391–403.
Porter, E., & Rogowski, J. (2018a). Partisanship, bureaucratic responsiveness, and election administration: Evidence from a field experiment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(4), 602–617.
Porter, E., & Rogowski, J. (2018b). Partisanship, bureaucratic responsiveness, and election administration: Evidence from a field experiment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(4), 602–617.
Pratama, A. (2016). Pelaksanaan desentralisasi asimetris dalam tata kelola pemerintahan daerah di era demokrasi. Jurnal Pendidikan Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan, 28(1), 1–13.
Quddus, M., & Firdaus, F. (2025). Dualisme Peran TNI: Bagaimana UU TNI Baru Memperkuat Atau Melemahkan Prinsip Supremasi Sipil dan Tata Kelola Pemerintahan? J-CEKI: Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah, 4(4), 464–473.
Rahayu, A., Setyawan, M., Al Mujahidin, S., & Fauzi, M. (2024). Pancasila Dan Good Governance: Strategi Memperkuat Akuntabilitas Publik Dalam Konteks Politik Identitas. Jurnal Global Citizen: Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, 13(1), 69–95.
Rahmadanni, S., & Deviani, D. (2024). Demokrasi, Kekuatan Politik dan Ukuran Pemerintah Daerah Terhadap Transparansi Pemerintah Daerah Provinsi di Indonesia. Jurnal Akademi Akuntansi, 7(1), 114–128.
Raintung, A., & Mesra, R. (2025). Hubungan Penguasa dan Pengusaha (Kajian Sosiologi Politik dan Demokrasi). ETIC (EDUCATION AND SOCIAL SCIENCE JOURNAL), 2(4), 364–376.
Rizkika, S., & Maulana, D. (2025). Politik Dinasti Di Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Hukum Dan Demokrasi. Mizan: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 14(2), 278–289.
Syafiola, M., & Ziqri, M. (2025). Realignment Politik Pasca Pilkada di Sumatera Barat. Jurnal Niara, 18(1), 146–158.
Telaumbanua, R. (2024). Dinasti Politik Dan Kualitas Demokrasi Di Pemerintahan Daerah Indonesia:“Evaluasi Dan Perspektif. Journal of Government (Kajian Manajemen Pemerintahan Dan Otonomi Daerah), 9(2), 55–67.
Trianjaya, M. (2024). Penerapan Hukum Tata Negara dalam Sistem Pemerintahan di Indonesia: Tantangan dalam Dinamika Politik Kontemporer. El-Siyasa: Journal of Constitutional Law, 2(1), 39.
Zuhro, R. (2019). Demokrasi dan pemilu Presiden 2019. Journal of Political Research, 16(1), 69–81.