Jurnal Sosial Indonesia

Ethic Statement

Publication Ethics and Statement of Publication Malpractice

(Based on Elsevier’s Recommendations and COPE Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors)

Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication

The publication of articles in reputable peer-reviewed journals published by Jurnal Sosial Indonesia constitutes an important contribution to the advancement of knowledge. Such publications reflect the quality of the authors’ scholarly work as well as the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles play a crucial role in maintaining and developing the scientific method.

Therefore, it is essential to establish shared standards of ethical behavior expected from all parties involved in the publication process, including authors, journal editors, peer reviewers, publishers, and supporting institutions or communities.

Jurnal Sosial Indonesia places ethical responsibility as a top priority at all stages of the publication process and fully recognizes the ethical and professional obligations inherent in journal management. The journal is committed to ensuring that advertising, reprints, or any other commercial revenue do not influence editorial decisions. The Editorial Board is also prepared to communicate with other journals or publishers when necessary to uphold the integrity of scholarly publishing.

 

Duties and Responsibilities of Authors

Reporting Standards

Authors of original research articles are required to present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. The underlying data must be represented honestly and accurately. Articles should provide sufficient detail and appropriate references to allow others to replicate the study. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Data Access and Retention

Authors may be requested to provide raw data related to the submitted manuscript for editorial review and should be prepared to provide public access to such data where feasible, in accordance with principles of open scientific data. Authors are also expected to retain research data for a reasonable period after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism

Authors must ensure that the submitted manuscript is entirely original. If the work, data, or ideas of others are used, proper citation and acknowledgment must be provided.

Multiple, Redundant, or Concurrent Publication

Authors should not publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript simultaneously to more than one journal constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgment of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have significantly influenced the reported research.

Authorship

Authorship should be limited to individuals who have made significant contributions to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the research. All individuals who have made substantial contributions should be listed as co-authors. Others who contributed in specific aspects of the research may be acknowledged. The corresponding author is responsible for ensuring that all appropriate co-authors are included, that no inappropriate authors are listed, and that all authors have approved the final version of the manuscript and agreed to its submission for publication.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors must disclose any potential conflicts of interest, whether financial or non-financial, that could influence the results or interpretation of the research. All sources of research funding must be clearly stated.

Fundamental Errors in Published Works

When authors discover significant errors or inaccuracies in their published work, they are obliged to promptly notify the journal editor and cooperate in correcting or retracting the article.

Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects

If the research involves hazardous chemicals, procedures, or equipment, these risks must be clearly identified in the manuscript. Research involving human or animal subjects must comply with applicable ethical research standards.

 

Duties and Responsibilities of Editors

Fair Play and Objectivity

Editors evaluate manuscripts based solely on their intellectual content and scholarly merit, without regard to the authors’ race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political views.

Confidentiality

Editors and editorial staff must maintain the confidentiality of all information related to submitted manuscripts and must not disclose such information to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, editorial advisers, or the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in submitted manuscripts must not be used by editors for their own research without the express written consent of the author.

Publication Decisions

The Editorial Board is responsible for deciding which submitted manuscripts should be published, based on their scientific validity and relevance to readers and researchers. Editorial decisions must comply with journal policies and applicable legal requirements concerning libel, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. Editors may consult with other editors or reviewers in making publication decisions.

Manuscript Review Process

Editors ensure that each manuscript undergoes an initial evaluation for originality and scholarly quality. The peer review process must be conducted fairly, objectively, and transparently, involving qualified reviewers who are free from conflicts of interest.

 

Duties and Responsibilities of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists editors in making editorial decisions and helps authors improve their manuscripts through constructive feedback.

Timeliness

Reviewers who feel unqualified to review a manuscript or are unable to complete the review within the specified time frame must promptly notify the editor and withdraw from the review process.

Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of authors is inappropriate. Reviewers should clearly express their assessments and support them with reasoned arguments.

Confidentiality

Manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents and must not be shared or discussed with others without authorization from the editor.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through the peer review process must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not evaluate manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest arising from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships with the authors or affiliated institutions.

Acknowledgment of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published works that have not been cited by the authors. Any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under review and other published works known to the reviewer must be reported to the editor.