A Qualitative Study on the Dynamics of Social Solidarity in Overcoming Socio-Economic Crises and Challenges

Main Article Content

Zaim Mukaffi
Amjad Hamad Abdullah

Abstract

The intersection of populism, political interference, and bureaucratic neutrality has become a critical issue for democratic governance, particularly in the context of socio-economic crises. This study aims to explore how the rise of populist movements affects the politicization of bureaucracy and its implications for democratic integrity. Through a qualitative approach, the research examines the impact of populism on public institutions, focusing on the role of social solidarity in crisis management. By reviewing recent literature and empirical studies, the research identifies the tensions between political loyalty and bureaucratic impartiality, and how such pressures undermine the neutrality of public servants. The findings reveal that the politicization of bureaucracy leads to diminished public trust, decreased transparency, and weakened accountability in governance. In response, the study highlights the importance of safeguarding bureaucratic neutrality, particularly in times of populist political influence, to maintain the legitimacy of public institutions. Social solidarity emerges as a vital force in overcoming socio-economic challenges, fostering community resilience, and mitigating the adverse effects of crises. The research underscores the need for comprehensive reforms to protect bureaucratic institutions from political pressures and enhance social solidarity to ensure effective governance.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

A Qualitative Study on the Dynamics of Social Solidarity in Overcoming Socio-Economic Crises and Challenges. (2026). Jurnal Sosial Indonesia, 1(1), 1-20. https://jurnalsosialindonesia.com/index.php/jsi/article/view/6

References

Bauer, M. (2019). Electoral management and the organisational determinants of electoral integrity: Introduction. International Political Science Review, 40(3), 295–312. 10.1177/0192512119828206

Bauer, M., & Becker, S. (2020). Democratic backsliding, populism, and public administration. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 3(1), 19–31. 10.1093/ppmgov/gvz026

Beck, J. (2021). Cognitive behavior therapy : basics and beyond (third) (1st ed., Vol. 1). The Guilford Press.

Bormasa, M. (2023). Menggalang solidaritas sosial: pengaruh kepedulian sosial dalam mengatasi tantangan lingkungan di daerah rentan bencana (studi di kabupaten cianjur). Jurnal Pengabdian West Science, 2(6), 477–489. https://doi.org/10.58812/jpws.v2i6.453

Bot, M. (2022). Bureaucracy, Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and the electoral process in Nigeria. International Journal of Intellectual Discourse, 5(3), 136–142. https://ijidjournal.org/index.php/ijid/article/view/288

Box, R. (2021). Administrative neutrality in the wake of Trumpism. Administration & Society, 53(9), 1463–1479. 10.1177/00953997211009897

Carpenter, D., & Krause, G. (2015). Transactional Authority and Bureaucratic Politics. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), 5–25. 10.1093/jopart/muu012

Cooper, C., & Reggie, J. (2025). Public sector employees’ political activity across administrative traditions: tensions between democratic participation and bureaucratic imHamiru, H., Umanailo, M.partiality in an era of populism and democratic backsliding. Public Administration Quarterly, 49(4), 253–277. DOI:10.1177/07349149241310404

Dama, M., Mayasari, A. D., & Situmorang, L. (2025). The Controversy of the Free Meal Programme in the General Election 2024 in Indonesia. DISCOURSE: Indonesian Journal of Social Studies and Education, 2(3), 179–191. https://doi.org/10.69875/djosse.v2i3.200

Fathoni, T. (2024). Konsep Solidaritas Sosial dalam Masyarakat Modern perspektif Émile Durkheim. Journal of Community Development and Disaster Management, 6(2), 129–147.DOI:10.58258/jisip.v7i3.5233

Gusfira, A., Bunaia, A., & Sinka, V. (2024). Pengaruh Pemikiran Ibnu Khaldun terhadap Perkembangan Ekonomi Islam di Indonesia. Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Islam, 1(4), 295–301. DOI:10.61132/moral.v1i4.391

Hentihu, I. (2023). Kohesi dan Jaringan Sosial dalam Tradisi Kai Wait Komunitas Pertanian di Kabupaten Buru. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 12(3), 498–507. https://doi.org/10.37481/jmh.v4i2.762

Handayani, N., Humaira, H., Firnando, J., Suhendra, A., & Malik, D. (2024). Model Kirkpatrick Sebagai Metode Mengukur Hasil Pelatihan Responsibility Dalam Berorganisas. Plakat: Jurnal Pelayanan Kepada Masyarakat, 6(1), 51–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.30872/plakat.v6i1.13218

Harjoni, P. R., Jaswir, I., Wira, A., & Novia, A. (2019). Epistemologi Ekonomi Islam: Perspektif Sosiologi Dalam Menghadapi Krisis Ekonomi Global. ISTIKHLAF : Jurnal Ekonomi, Perbankan & Manajemen Syariah, 1(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.51311/istikhlaf.v7i1.707

Mulyani, D. S., & Hanani, S. (2025). Dinamika Solidaritas Mekanis dan Tantangan Masyarakat Islam di Era Kontemporer. Journal of Economics Business Ethic And Science Histories, 3(5), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.51311/istikhlaf.v7i1.707

Noer, H. (2024). Portrait of the Politicization of Indonesian Bureaucracy in the 2024 Election. International Journal of Social Service and Research, 4(3), 752–769. Portrait of the Politicization of Indonesian Bureaucracy in the 2024 Election

Nugroho, R., Putri, D., Santoso, T., & Utomo, D. (2019). Government Official Political Neutrality in Digital Era: Challenge for Administrative Ethics?. In Iapa Proceedings Conference, 406–426.

Nurullah, M. (2026). Peran UMKM dalam Penguatan Modal Sosial dan Kesejahteraan Sosial Ekonomi Masyarakat Indonesia. Journal of Educational Psychology and Social Well-Being, 1(1), 1–8.

Oliveros, V., & Schuster, C. (2018). Merit, tenure, and bureaucratic behavior: Evidence from a conjoint experiment in the Dominican Republic. Comparative Political Studies, 51(6), 759–792. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414017710268

Pardede, K. D. P., & Kristian, R. (2021). Analysis of Strengthening Bureaucracy Neutrality Policy Implementation in the Local Elections (A Study in North Sumatera). LOGOS : Journal of Local Government Issues, 1(1), 1–12. DOI:10.22219/logos.v4i2.16418

Park, S., & Liang, J. (2021). A comparative study of gender representation and social outcomes: The effect of political and bureaucratic representation. Public Administration Review, 81(2), 321–332. DOI:10.1111/puar.13092

Pertiwi, D. N. (2022). Solidaritas Paguyuban Pedagang Kaki Lima Kabupaten Ponorogo Dalam Mengatasi Krisis Ekonomi Pada Masa Pandemi. The Sociology Journal Paradigma , 1(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.29103/aaj.v9i1.21292

Pertiwi, R., & Fariq, A. (2023). Pengaruh Stres Akademik terhadap Motivasi Belajar Mahasiswa. Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan Dan Konseling, 9(2), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.4567/jppk.v9i2.4619

Polga-Hecimovich, J. (2019). Bureaucratic politicization, partisan attachments, and the limits of public agency legitimacy: The Venezuelan armed forces under chavismo. Latin American Research Review, 54(2), 476–498. https://doi.org/10.25222/larr.142

Porter, E., & Rogowski, J. (2018). Partisanship, bureaucratic responsiveness, and election administration: Evidence from a field experiment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(4), 602–617. DOI:10.1093/jopart/muy025

Putra, A., Fitri, S., & Marjo, H. (2025). Pendekatan Cognitive Behavioral Therapy dalam mereduksi perilaku agresif pada remaja korban kekerasan dalam rumah tangga: Narrative synthesis. G-Couns: Jurnal Bimbingan Dan Konseling, 9(3), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.31316/g-couns.v9i3.7588

Rahmawati, A., & Supriyadi, A. (2025). Membangun Ketahanan Dan Keamanan Sosial: Model Pertahanan Non-Militer Berbasis Komunitas. Inovasi Pembangunan: Jurnal Kelitbangan, 13(2), 13–23. DOI:10.35450/jip.v13i2.1122

Sarnawa, B., & Khaer, F. (2024). Historical Study of the Neutrality Arrangements of the State Civil Apparatus in General Elections in Indonesia. Jurnal Media Hukum, 31(2), 262–279. https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.v31i2.22618

Suherman, T. (2025). Dinamika Institusi Sosial Dalam Masyarakat Multikultural: Analisis Peran Organisasi Masyarakat Dalam Integrasi Sosial. Jurnal Internasional Multidisiplin Ilmu, 1(1), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.53611/32f9cg75

Syahrudin, Rohani, I., Prasetiyan, D., Huda, F., & Khusnul, F. S. (2025). Penguatan Solidaritas Sosial dan Ekonomi Kerakyatan Melalui Program Gebyar Ramadhan di Desa Karangpatihan Ponorogo. JPM: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 4(2), 51–69. https://doi.org/10.52434/jpm.v4i2.42762

Tamba, W., Hartanto, M., & Putri, P. (2024). Pancasila sebagai Dasar Kebijakan Kesejahteraan Sosial di Indonesia. Pancasila: Jurnal Keindonesiaan, 4(2), 146–162. DOI:10.52738/pjk.v4i2.573

Tamma, S. (2016). Paradox of Bureaucracy Neutrality in The Indonesia Regional Election. Palita: Journal of Social Religion Research, 1(2), 95–112. DOI:10.24256/pal.v1i2.69

Tavares, G., Story, J., & Lotta, G. (2025). Bureaucrats in Campaigns: Elections Increase Dysfunctional Behaviors Among Civil Servants. Public Administration Review, 1(1), 1–13. DOI:10.1111/puar.70046

Yesilkagit, K., Bauer, M., Peters, B., & Pierre, J. (2024). The Guardian State: Strengthening the public service against democratic backsliding. Public Administration Review, 84(3), 414–425. DOI:10.13140/RG.2.2.13759.28326

Yusuf, M., Wahid, M., & Saadah, M. (2024). The Politics-Bureaucracy Relationship: A Variation of Clientelism Network in Jambi Local Election. In 2nd International Conference on Democracy and Social Transformation, 55–59. 10.2991/978-2-38476-174-6_11